Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dejana Radanovic vs Julia Middendorf Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Radanovic vs Middendorf analysis and find out who is favored!
Dejana Radanovic vs Julia Middendorf Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Radanovic 1 - 0 Middendorf
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Radanovic has won 41.52% of points on his second serve, while Middendorf has won 45.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Radanovic, in recent form, has won 57.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Middendorf has won 51.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.79% and 38.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Radanovic has saved 54.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Middendorf has saved 54.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Radanovic has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 40/ 20), with Middendorf winning 55.88% (W/L 38/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Radanovic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 34/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Middendorf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Radanovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.8% of matches (W/L 40/ 19), where as Middendorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.92% of matches (W/L 37/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Radanovic winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Radanovic winning 2 and Middendorf winning 1. The last match between Radanovic and Middendorf was at the W35 Helsinki, 29-02-2024, Second, I.hard with Dejana Radanovic getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Radanovic and Middendorf have played a deciding set 1 times, with Radanovic winning 1 times and Middendorf 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Radanovic winning 0, and Middendorf 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Radanovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 332.68 while Middendorf has played against players with an average rank of 272.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Radanovic has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Middendorf has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Radanovic has converted 50.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Middendorf has converted 47.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
236
Rank
187
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
376
Rank
347
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
61% (331-211)
Career Total W/L
58% (105-75)
50% (10-10)
YTD W/L
48% (12-13)
$12,023
Career Prize Money
$5,362
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Radanovic VS Middendorf H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Dejana Radanovic | Julia Middendorf |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:17:0 | 2:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (57/82) | 58% (51/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (39/57) | 67% (34/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 35% (13/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (41/88) | 35% (29/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Radanovic VS Middendorf H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 6-2 |
Stats 
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Julia Middendorf
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dejana Radanovic | Julia Middendorf |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (10/10) | 48% (12/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (22/21) | 49% (27/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (207/194) | 49% (239/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (4/1) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:42 | 1:20:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 346.6 | 218.72 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (840/1353) | 63% (878/1392) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (530/840) | 61% (536/878) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (213/513) | 46% (235/514) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (83/163) | 48% (71/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (591/1293) | 43% (597/1389) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (10/9) | 48% (11/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 48% (12/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 13% (15/2) |
Dejana Radanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Dejana Radanovic
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Dejana Radanovic
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
37
Total Points Won
35
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Xiyu Wang
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Dejana Radanovic
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Tatiana Pieri
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Dejana Radanovic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Alina Granwehr
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dejana Radanovic
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Dejana Radanovic
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Middendorf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Svetac
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Alana Subasic
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Julia Middendorf
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Julia Middendorf
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Mariani
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Julia Middendorf
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Dea Herdzelas
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Micol Salvadori
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Julia Middendorf
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Michaela Laki
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Radanovic Vs Middendorf Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
